THIS IS NOT A NEW CITY [ PARIS ]
2012 // THESIS PROJECT / PART TWO // AARHUS SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE [DK]
[ P A R I S ]
[ City Condition, part one ] [ Aarhus, part three ] [ The Model, part four ] [ Manifesto ]
[ preface ]
I went to Paris, not to bring back a piece of Paris, but to learn from the different spatial qualities the city offers. To investigate the potential and recognize how city conditions are developed.
When contemplating Paris, the images that spring to mind are of vibrant street life. In Paris, life is lived on the streets; it is at the cafés, in the galleries, and bars. Paris encompasses a vast number of public gathering points; the very city is built as a public space, constructed for the meeting of people, encouraging interaction.
“Apartment buildings displayed and oriented a collective that communicated fully with the public street [...] The space of early nineteenth-century Parisian buildings mingled with the space of streets in concrete, quotidian ways.” The streetscape changes throughout the day with the galleries and cafés. Most of the galleries have an open door policy and the cafés are more often than not, able to open their entire facade, inside and outside merging as the café-space flows into the streetscape.
Besides this, there is a wealth of small inner courtyards opening towards the street. When exploring these you are in for a surprise, every once in a while they are not courtyards at all, but small passages. In the courtyard or passage, here you will find a small milieu, sometimes there is a café at others a gallery, and a small gap leads to a bright opening arranged around a tree. It is this abundance of spatial experience that enhances the desire, the urge to discover the city.
“The writers who represented the city to itself thus not only emphasized apartment houses as elements of Parisian landscape but also saw through the apartment house, treating it as a lens or as a point of view and not simply as an opaque visual object. In the process, they imagined apartment houses to be as transparent as they wanted the city to be.” I read this not as a longing for literal transparency, but rather a phenomenal one, as described by Colin Rowe and Robert Slutzky. The quote holds no real value if it is understood as a desire for the literal transparency of the glasshouses. It is in the phenomenal transparency that real understanding lies. Here the threshold between the city, the public, and the apartment, the private blurs resulting in the annexation of the apartment into the city.
The flâneur is from Paris. He drifts around in space and experiences the city with his body. “The crowd is the veil through which the familiar city beckons to the flâneur as phantasmagoria - now a landscape, now a room”
The flâneur turns the cityscape into the landscape, the interior to exterior, whereby the city becomes an interior landscape at the will of the flâneur. Through the concept of similitude, the flâneur holds an ability to superimpose space.
“The discourse of urban observation described the apartment building as a typical and integral physical feature of the Parisian landscape and, strikingly, as a figure for the objects and activity of urban observation itself.” The quote furthers the conception of the apartment being an active, almost public part of the city and hereby also a territory for the flâneur.