THIS IS NOT A NEW CITY
2012 // THESIS PROJECT // AARHUS SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE [DK]
MANIFESTO
[ City Condition, part one ] [ Paris, part two ] [ Aarhus, part three ] [ The Model, part four ]
If you pay any attention to culture and history, you’ll accept there is no global solution to how we construct cities; however, there still exists a set of global conditions worth pursuing. The following text tries to identify these and investigate their implementation in European, and to some extent North American - cities.
If everyone agrees that we have to pursue densification of our cities, why then is most development still done after the modernistic tabula rasa method, expanding our cities by revoking more land, in order to place an object in the center of a plot?
It is time for architects to take responsibility. It’s our duty to lead the way; also when it gets tough. It is our responsibility, as architects, to investigate and develop strategies for living and dwelling in the future.
A city is a living organism, it thrives on life, and it must forever stay in motion to survive. A city cannot consist of only one thing - one center or one type - it must be made up of a multitude of centers, all with different characters; connected and interacting in numerous ways, creating a holistic common open network.
The development of our cities has resulted in separation, now we can talk about the city at the core of the urban structure and the periphery surrounding it. The city consists of streets, buildings, squares, and parks. It’s a gradient of space, from the public to the private, no two cities are alike, but the feel of a city is clear; the city condition.
The periphery is a confusing mixture of apartment blocks, terraced housing, villas, shopping centers, corporate headquarters, etc, all separated. There is a private feel to any given area, a distinct lack of identity. Is it utopian to think that we could bring the feeling of the city to these areas? Build structures on top of villas, connecting them in a network, inside the former residence; cafés and a locker room for joggers and bikers alike to start their venture on the new structures, climbing to the top of the apartment blocks, now dissected by new living situations. You no longer buy a house or apartment, but square meters, more or less connected, intertwined with one another. This isn’t an attempt to make every area like the city center, but it’s a quest to turn every area into a place. One could be a sports-like place, a garden-like place, a children-like place, etc. Since development occurs in existing areas, we do not need to claim more land.
In developing an architecture to overcome these obstacles, I urge that we turn to temporary architecture as the primary vessel for investigating and testing new ways of living; benefiting from the greater pace and degree of flexibility could inform us about new ways of producing city. For the only true test of architecture is to be found at the 1:1 scale, here and only here, can concepts be brought to life, tested over weeks, months, or years and bring forth answers about life. In this manner contributing to the production of city and where the periphery and the city merge, they will do so with varying centers competing and complementing each other generating a stronger city.